![]() ![]() ![]() Nothing is just "objectively better" it's a different trade off. The company noted that as of this quarter. It's similar to how the linux kernel can be compiled with low latency in mind which causes lower throughput but makes the desktop experience much nicer (ime). Backblaze has released its reliability report for Q1 2016 covering cumulative failure rates both by specific model numbers and by manufacturer. ![]() This is not the only difference, but it's one thing to consider. Here’s a deeper look into the SSD and HDD drive stats for Q3 2021 at Backblaze. This drastically improves the lifetime of the drives since they're slowly wearing down vs "going bad" because of a single block being unrecoverable. By September 30, 2021, Backblaze was managing a whopping 194,749 drives. Sometimes what it comes down to is firmware WD NAS drives used to be almost identical to conumer drives except their firmware would report errors back to the SATA controller directly instead of continually trying to read the block.Ĭontinually reading the block seems doomed but it works a surprisingly large number of times, and when it's successful the block is often put somewhere else on the drive transparently (and the old block is marked as "bad"). market/en/news/cloud-standards-coordination-final-report (accessed July 9. Just to add: Consumer drives are not necessarily sub-par quality-wise just because they're consumer drives. You can find the raw data here: At this point it goes back almost a full decade. Best hard drives in the world Cloud storage and data backup company Backblaze has published its latest Drive Stats report, revealing which of the hard. Now, we do save (and publish) all the raw data, and some other awesome people out there have done various analysis on it, which always makes us happy also. Backblaze has released the 2018 installment of its Hard Drive Stats report. If the reads and writes and seeks our drives experience matches your particular application, great! Or maybe it is just interesting to read. Sometimes readers think we're carefully running a "study", but it's more just what we have experienced as honestly as we can offer it up. We don't run any specific tests or induce issues on purpose FOR the drive failure stats, we just report what occurred in our datacenter. To be clear about what these drive failure stats are and what they are not: Backblaze runs a data storage service with about 214,000 hard drives in it right now. > Is there a failure list for write heavy drives? Let’s start with drive days, the total number of days all the hard drives of a given model have been operational. Disclaimer: I work at Backblaze but more on the backup client side that runs on laptops, not in the datacenter storage side. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |